Sidebar

Magazine menu

15
Fri, Nov

TCH426E - Project Financing

Chương trình tiêu chuẩn Phân tích và đầu tư tài chính (áp dụng từ K62 trở đi)

User Rating: 0 / 5

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive
 

 

1. COURSE OBJECTIVES

 

This course aims to provide students with the basic knowledge of project financing including: overview of project financing, risk analysis and risk management in project financing, the role of project advisors in project financing activities, project assessment and cash flow analysis, project financing plans, credit risks in project financing transactions and Basel's new capital treaty.

2. COURSE CONTENT

 

Time

Content

Time allocation


Contri-bution to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, Exercises,

Assignments

(3)

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

(4)

Lecture

Practice, Seminar

 

1-3

Chapter 1: Overview of project financing

6

3

3

12

1, 6, 7, 8

4-6

Chapter 2: Risk Analysis and Risk Management in Project Financing

6

3

4.5

16.5

2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

7-9

Chapter 3: Appraisal of investment projects

6

3

4.5

16.5

3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.10

10-12

Chapter 4: Project Financing

6

3

6

21

1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

13-14

Chapter 5: Case studies

4

2

3

11

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8, 9.10

15

Semester-end review

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8, 9, 10

Total

30

15

22.5

82.5

 

3. COURSE ASSESSMENT

  • - Score ladder: 10

    - Type of assessment:

    Form 

    Content

    Criteria

    CLO 

    Proportion

     

    Formative

    Attendance

    The number of attendances and participation in lesson

    List and/or Personal Exercises

     

    7, 8

     

    10%

    Midterm exam

    Chapter 1,2,3

    Written exam (45 minutes)

    1-6

    20%

    Course work

    By theme

    Group/individual exercises

    1-8

    10%

    Summative

    Final test

    Issues have been studied

    MCQ and Written exam (60 minutes)

    1-7

    60%

     

         

    Total:

    100%


    * Grading rubrics for individual’s/group’s written assignment/report

    Criteria

    CLO

    Weighted average

    Level of Assessment

    Grade

    A

    B

    C

    D

    F

    8,5-10

    7-8,4

    5,5-6,9

    4,0-5,4

    <4

    Format 

    8,9,10

    20%

    All assignment format’s requirements are met with professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. 

    Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors



    Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

    Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar 

    Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements





     

    Writing style  

    9,10

    20%

    Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

    Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 



    Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas



    Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

    Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

     

    Content

    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

    50%

    Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

    Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

    Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

    Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

    Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

     

    Reference

    1,2,3,4,5,6,9,10

    10%

    A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

    A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citation. 

    Sources are reasonable but lack of diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

    Sources are lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

    The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

     

    Member contribution

    9,10

    It depends on the cross-assessment.

    Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

    Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

    Not really proactive when participating. there is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

    Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

    Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

     

    Note: 

    Lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation


    • Grading rubrics for individual/group presentation

    Criteria

    CLO

    Weighted Average

    Levels of Assessment

    Grade

    A

    B

    C

    D

    F

    8,5-10

    7-8,4

    5,5-6,9

    4,0-5,4

    <4

    Presentation Organization 

    7,8

    10%

    Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

    Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

    Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

    Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

    Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

     

    Presentation Content

    1,2,3,6

    50%

    Content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

    Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

    Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

    Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

    Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

     

    Presentation skills

    7,8,9

    10%

    Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

    Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

    Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

    Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

    Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

     

    Q & A 

    1,2,3,6,8,9

    10%

    Fluently answer all questions from audience

    Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

    Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

    Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

    Unable to answer any questions from audience

     

    Use of media  

    7,8

    10%

    PPT is clear, relevant and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

    PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

    PPT is simple

    PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

    None

     

    Presentation time

    9

    5%

    Stay on time 

    Over ¼  time limit 

    Over 1/3 time limit

    Over ½  time limit

    Double time limit 

     

    Dress code 

    9

    5%

    Formal and professional dress code 

    Formal and neat dress code 

    Casual and informal dress code

    Casual dress code

    Unsuitable and impolite dress code. 

     

 

 

THÔNG BÁO

VĂN BẢN - BIỂU MẪU

Số lượng truy cập

19635391
Hôm nay
Hôm qua
Tuần này
Tuần trước
Tháng này
Tháng trước
Tất cả
1005
18291
50273
19443930
218692
3184527
19635391

Địa chỉ IP: 18.118.253.171
2024-11-15