Ngành Tài chính ngân hàng (áp dụng từ K62 trở đi)

No.

Content

Time Allocation

Contri-bution to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, exercise, 

Assignments

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

Lecture

Practice, Seminar

1

Chapter 1 The Investment Setting.

2

1

1

5.5

1, 7, 8

2

Chapter 2: Risk and Return

2

1

1

5.5

2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8

3

Chapter 3: The Asset Allocation Decision.

2

1

2

5.5

3, 4, 6, 7, 8

4

Chapter 4: Efficient Capital Markets.

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 4, 6, 7, 8

5

Chapter 5: An Introduction to Portfolio Management.

2

2

1.5

5.5

1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8

6

Chapter 6:An Introduction to Asset Pricing Models.

2

1

1

5.5

4, 6, 7, 8

7

Chapter 7: An Introduction to Security Valuation

2

1

2

5.5

4, 6, 7, 8

8

Chapter 8: Analysis and management of common stocks

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 4, 6, 7, 8

9

Chapter 9: Bond Fundamentals

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 5, 6, 7, 8

10

Chapter 10: The analysis and valuation of bonds

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 5, 6, 7, 8

11

Chapter 11: Bond management Strategies

2

1

1.5

5.5

4, 6, 7, 8

12

Chapter 12: An introduction to derivative markets and securities

2

1

2

5.5

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

13

Chapter 13: Forward-Futures-Options

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

14

Chapter 14: Swaps

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

15

Chapter 15: Evaluation of Portfolio Performance

2

1

1.5

5.5

3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Total (hour)

30

22.5

15

82.5

Form

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

Level of class participation

The number of attendances and participation in lesson

7 - 8

10%

Mid-term Exam and/or Assignment

Knowledge achieved up to lecture 7 or 8.

Written and/or MCQ exam in 30 - 45 minutes and/or assignment

1 – 7

30%

Summative

Final test

Knowledge achieved throughout the course

MCQ and/or written exam (45 - 60 mins)

1 - 7

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with a professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. 

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar 

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements

Writing style  

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citations. 

Sources are reasonable but lack diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citations.

Sources are lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citations.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citations.

Member contribution

*Indicates the participation, responsibility and independence

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadlines set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. There is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

Lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

No

Content

Allocation

Contribution to CLO

In class

Essays, exercise, assignment

Self-study with the teacher’s tutorials

Theory

Practice, Seminar

1

Chapter 1: Overview of financial technology in banking and finance

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 12, 13, 14

2

Chapter 2: The first applications of financial technology in the banking sector 

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 2, 12, 13, 14

3-4

Chapter 3: Innovations in payment and deposit services 

4

2

3

11

3, 12, 13, 14

5-6

Chapter 4: Innovations in digital lending

4

2

3

11

4, 12, 13, 14

7

Chapter 5: The necessity of innovation of commercial banks 

2

1

1.5

5.5

5, 12, 13, 14

8

Presentation with provided topics

2

1

1.5

5.5

9-10

Chapter 6: Crowdfunding and community investment 

4

2

3

11

6, 12, 13, 14

11-12

Chapter 7: Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in banking and finance

4

2

3

11

7, 12, 13, 14

13-14

Chapter 8: Blockchain and its applications in banking and finance

4

2

3

11

8, 12, 13, 14

15

Practice: E-wallet transactions, Price list of cryptocurrencies, ...

2

1

1.5

5.5

9, 10, 11

Total

30

15

22.5

82.5

Form

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

Attendance check

1 – 14

10%

Midterm exam

Chapters 1-4

Group presentation/ Case study Report/ Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions)

Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions 

(60 minutes)

1 – 14

30%

Summative

Final exam

Chapters 1-7

Group presentation/ Case study Report/ Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions)

Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions 

(60 minutes)

1 – 14

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

1 – 14

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with a professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited.

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar.

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements.

Writing style  

1 – 14

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

1 – 14

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

1 – 14

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citations. 

Sources are reasonable but lack diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citations.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

1 – 14

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. There is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

The lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Presentation Organization 

1 – 14

10%

Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

Presentation Content

1 – 14

50%

The content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

Presentation skills

1 – 14

10%

Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Q & A 

1 – 14

10%

Fluently answer all questions from audience

Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

Unable to answer any questions from audience

Use of media  

1 – 14

10%

PPT is clear, relevant, and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

PPT is simple

PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

None

Presentation time

1 – 14

5%

Stay on time 

Over ¼ time limit 

Over 1/3 time limit

Over ½  time limit

Double time limit 

Dress code 

1 – 14

5%

Formal and professional dress code 

Formal and neat dress code 

Casual and informal dress code

Casual dress code

Unsuitable and impolite dress code. 

No

Content

Allocation

Contribute to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, exercise, assignments

Self-study with the teacher’s tutorials

Lecture

Practice, Seminar

1

Chapter 1. Overview of Information Technology in Finance - Banking

3

0

3

11

1

2

Chapter 2. Financial Technology (Fintech) Overview

3

0

1.5

5.5

1, 2

3

Chapter 3: Application of Financial Technology (Fintech) in Finance - Banking

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 2

4

Chapter 4: Machine Learning

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 3

5

Chapter 4: Machine Learning (Continue)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 3

6

Chapter 4: Machine Learning (Continue)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 3

7

Chapter 5: Big Data

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 4

8

Chapter 5: Big Data (Continue)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1, 4

9

Mid-term exam 

10

Chapter 6: Reviewing basic tasks and financial functions in Excel

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 7, 8

11

Chapter 7: Reviewing advanced tasks and financial functions in Excel

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 7, 8

12

Chapter 8: Data Analysis Using Excel

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 6, 7, 8

13

Chapter 8: Data Analysis Using Excel (Continue)

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 6, 7, 8

14

Chapter 9: Getting Started with Excel VBA

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 6, 7, 8

15

Chapter 9: Getting Started with Excel VBA (Continue)

2

1.5

1.5

5.5

5, 6, 7, 8

Total

30

15

22.5

82.5

Form

Content

Criteria

CLO

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

Attendance check

1 – 5, 9

10%

Summative

Mid – term test

Chapters 1-5

Group presentation/ Case study Report/ Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions)

Written exam (MCQ &/or problem-solving questions 

(60 minutes)

1 – 5, 9

30%

Final exam

The whole course

Multiple – choice questions and present steps and results from practice in computer

1 – 8

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

1 – 5, 9

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with a professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited.

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar.

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements.

Writing style  

1 – 5, 9

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

1 – 5, 9

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

1 – 5, 9

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citations. 

Sources are reasonable but lack diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citations.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

1 – 5, 9

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. There is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

The lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Presentation Organization 

1 – 5, 9

10%

Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

Presentation Content

1 – 5, 9

50%

The content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

Presentation skills

1 – 5, 9

10%

Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Q & A 

1 – 5, 9

10%

Fluently answer all questions from audience

Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

Unable to answer any questions from audience

Use of media  

1 – 5, 9

10%

PPT is clear, relevant, and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

PPT is simple

PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

None

Presentation time

1 – 5, 9

5%

Stay on time 

Over ¼ time limit 

Over 1/3 time limit

Over ½  time limit

Double time limit 

Dress code 

1 – 5, 9

5%

Formal and professional dress code 

Formal and neat dress code 

Casual and informal dress code

Casual dress code

Unsuitable and impolite dress code. 

No.

Contents

Time Allocation

Contribution to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, exercise, 

Assignments...

(3)

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

(4) 

Lecture

(1)

Practice, Seminar

(2)

1.

Chapter 1. Bank Management

2

1

1.5

5.5 

1,2.3.10.11.12.13.14

2.

Chapter 1. Bank Management (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,2.3.10.11.12.13.14

3.

Chapter 1. Bank Management (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,2.3.10.11.12.13.14

4.

Chapter 2: Corporate Finance and Bond Valuation

2

1

1.5

5.5

4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14

5.

Chapter 2: Corporate Finance and Bond Valuation (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14

6.

Chapter 2: Corporate Finance and Bond Valuation (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14

7.

Chapter 2: Corporate Finance and Bond Valuation (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

4,5,6,10,11,12,13,14

8.

Chapter 3: Portfolio Theory and Portfolio Management

2

1

1.5

5.5

7.8.10.11.12.13.14

9.

Chapter 3: Portfolio Theory and Portfolio Management (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

7.8.10.11.12.13.14

10.

Chapter 3: Portfolio Theory and Portfolio Management (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

7.8.10.11.12.13.14

11.

Chapter 3: Portfolio Theory and Portfolio Management (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

7.8.10.11.12.13.14

12.

Chapter 4: Derivative Instruments, Alternative Investments and Funds

2

1

1.5

5.5

8.9.10.11.12.13.14

13.

Chapter 4: Derivative Instruments, Alternative Investments and Funds (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

8.9.10.11.12.13.14

14.

Chapter 4: Derivative Instruments, Alternative Investments and Funds (cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

8.9.10.11.12.13.14

15.

Chapter 4: Derivative Instruments, Alternative Investments and Funds

(cont’d)

2

1

1.5

5.5

8.9.10.11.12.13.14

Total (hour)

30

15

22.5

82.5

Form

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

The number of attendances and participation in lesson

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14

10%

Midterm test

.

Essays

.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14

    30 %

Summative

Final test

MCQ 

Essay

Exercise 

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

1 – 14

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with a professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited.

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar.

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements.

Writing style  

1 – 14

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

1 – 14

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

1 – 14

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citations. 

Sources are reasonable but lack diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citations.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

1 – 14

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. There is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

The lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Presentation Organization 

1 – 14

10%

Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

Presentation Content

1 – 14

50%

The content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

Presentation skills

1 – 14

10%

Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Q & A 

1 – 14

10%

Fluently answer all questions from audience

Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

Unable to answer any questions from audience

Use of media  

1 – 14

10%

PPT is clear, relevant, and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

PPT is simple

PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

None

Presentation time

1 – 14

5%

Stay on time 

Over ¼ time limit 

Over 1/3 time limit

Over ½  time limit

Double time limit 

Dress code 

1 – 14

5%

Formal and professional dress code 

Formal and neat dress code 

Casual and informal dress code

Casual dress code

Unsuitable and impolite dress code. 

No.

Content

Time Allocation

Contri-bution to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, Exercises, 

Assignments

(3)

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

(4)

Lecture

Practice, Seminar

1

Chapter 1: Overview of real estate finance and investments

2

1

1

5.5

1,7

2

Chapter 2: Mortgage Loan

2

1

1

5.5

1,2,7

3

Chapter 3. Income-producing properties: Leases, Rents, and the Market for Space

2

1

2

5.5

1,3,7

4

Chapter 4: Financial Leverage and Financing Alternatives

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,3,7

5

Chapter 4: Financial Leverage and Financing Alternatives (cont.)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,3,7

6

Chapter 5: Valuation of Income Properties: Appraisal and the Market for Capital

2

1

1

5.5

1,4,7

7

Chapter 5: Valuation of Income Properties: Appraisal and the Market for Capital (cont.)

2

1

2

5.5

1,4,7

8

Chapter 6: Risk Analysis

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,4,7

9

Chapter 6: Risk Analysis (cont.)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,4,7

10

Chapter 7: Financing Real Estate Development 

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,5,7

11

Chapter 7: Financing Real Estate Development (cont.)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,5,7

12

Chapter 8: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

2

1

2

5.5

1,5,7

13

Chapter 8: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) (cont.)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,5,7

14

Chapter 9: Real Estate Investment Performance and Portfolio Considerations

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,6,7

15

Chapter 9: Real Estate Investment Performance and Portfolio Considerations (cont.)

2

1

1.5

5.5

1,6,7

Total

30 

15 

22.5 

82.5

Form 

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

The number of attendances and participation in lesson

7-10

10%

Midterm exam

Issues have been studied

MCQ or/and Written exam (60 minutes)

1-4, 7

30%

Summative

Final test

MCQ or/and Written exam (60 minutes)

1-10

60%

Total

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. 

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar 

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements

Writing style  

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citation. 

Sources are reasonable but lack of diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources are lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

*Indicates the participation, responsibility and independence

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. there is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

Lecturer instructs group member to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Presentation Organization 

7,8

10%

Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

Presentation Content

1,2,3,6

50%

Content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

Presentation skills

7,8,9

10%

Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Q & A 

1,2,3,6,8,9

10%

Fluently answer all questions from audience

Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

Unable to answer any questions from audience

Use of media  

7,8

10%

PPT is clear, relevant and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

PPT is simple

PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

None

Presentation time

9

5%

Stay on time 

Over ¼  time limit 

Over 1/3 time limit

Over ½  time limit

Double time limit 

Dress code 

9

5%

Formal and professional dress code 

Formal and neat dress code 

Casual and informal dress code

Casual dress code

Unsuitable and impolite dress code. 

No.

Time Allocation

Content 

Contribution to CLOs

1

Week 1

Introduce the course, exchange and agree on the outline and practice plan

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

2

Week 13

Mid-term exchange: internship content, advantages and disadvantages during the internship

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

3

Week 26

Exchange at the end of the term, approve the midterm report to print the final version and submit it to the instructor

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

Form

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proport-ion

Formati-ve

Internship process

0%

Summa-tive

Internship Report

Write a report according to the regulations of the module

The content and form of the report according to the regulations

CLO1-11

100%

Total

100%