CLCKT: TCHE321 _ Tài chính doanh nghiệp (Corporate Finance)

No.

Contents

Time Allocation

Contribution to CLO

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, exercise, 

Assignments...

(3)

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

(4)

Lecture

(1)

Practice, Seminar…

(2)

1

Introduction

3

0

2

6.5

1,7,8,9

2-3

Financial statements analysis

3

3

3

9.5

2,7,8,9

4-6

Investment projects appraisal method

6

3

5

16

3,7,8,9

7-9

Rate of interest, risk, capital asset pricing model (CAPM)

6

3

5

16

4,7,8,9

10-12

Capital Structure

6

3

5

16

5,7,8,9

13-14

Dividend policy

3

3

3

9.5

5,7,8,9

15

Working capital management

3

0

2

6.5

6,7,8,9

Total (hour)

30

15

25

80

Form 

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

The number of attendances and participation in lesson

9

10%

Midterm test

.

Mid-term test/

Assignment + presentation

1,2,3,7,8

    30%

Assignment

Summative

Final test

MCQ and/or written exam

1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. 

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar 

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements

Writing style  

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citation. 

Sources are reasonable but lack of diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources are lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

*Indicates the participation, responsibility and independence

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. there is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

Lecturer instructs group member to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Presentation Organization 

10%

Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow

Quite clear organization which is easy to follow

Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow

Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent

Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. 

Presentation Content

50%

Content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation

Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical

Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas

Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas

Presentation skills

10%

Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience 

Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience 

Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience

Q & A 

10%

Fluently answer all questions from audience

Answer about 2/3 questions from audience

Answer about 1/2 questions from audience

Answer about 1/3 questions from audience

Unable to answer any questions from audience

Use of media  

10%

PPT is clear, relevant and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience

PPT is well-designed and easy to follow 

PPT is simple

PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow

None

Presentation time

5%

Stay on time 

Over ¼  time limit 

Over 1/3 time limit

Over ½  time limit

Double time limit 

Dress code 

5%

Formal and professional dress code 

Formal and neat dress code 

Casual and informal dress code

Casual dress code

Unsuitable and impolite dress code.